PoseBusters

Physics-aware eval of docking/co-folding poses — 19 checks catching chemically impossible outputs.

Composite
97.0
Experimental validation
Retrospective
Stages
Hit ID
Modalities
small-moleculeprotein-general
Task types
pose-validation
Size
complexes: 428
checks_per_pose: 19
License
BSD-3-Clause
First release
2023-08
Last updated
2025-02
Official site
→ project page
Leaderboard
→ leaderboard
Dataset
→ dataset
Code / GitHub
→ repository
HuggingFace
→ HF
Paper
PoseBusters: AI-based docking methods fail to generate physically valid poses or generalise to novel sequences · Buttenschoen M, Morris GM, Deane CM · 2024 · paper · doi:10.1039/D3SC04185A · 360 citations
Flags
none
Experts
Charlotte Deane, Martin Buttenschoen
Groups
Oxford OPIG (Deane Lab)
Hosted by
PoseBusters Evaluation Suite
Related benchmarks
PLINDER, PINDER, CASF-2016

Rubric (7-criterion)

rigor
5
coverage
4
maintenance
5
adoption
5
quality
5
accessibility
5
industry_relevance
5

Notes

Exposed major failure modes in AlphaFold-Multimer/DiffDock/RFAA. Default pharma filter.

← Back to all benchmarks

Compare:
Open comparison →